Variation within Limits: An Evolutionary Approach to the Structure and Dynamics of the Multiform

Abstract

This essay draws upon research in evolutionary biology and cognitive psychology to explain the evolution and stability of the oral-traditional multiform. The mind tends to categorize variable entities in terms of cognitive prototypes. The dynamics of human mnemonic and communicative processes then generate both variability (in the absence of written texts) and contrasting selection pressure on multiform oral-traditional forms to evolve towards these mental abstractions, thereby producing the variability of the multiform. By visualizing the variation spaces of such cultural entities as adaptive landscapes, we see that variation-within-limits of the multiform, rather than being paradoxical, results from universal processes of replication and selection.

eCompanion

loading

Representation of the relative fitness of morphotypes of Cædmon’s Hymn, line 5.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

“Skyscraper” landscape represents fitness of multiple discrete morphotypes.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

Many minor variations of morphotypes create a near-gradient.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

Adaptive landscape populated with entities.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

Adaptive landscape populated with entities.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

Cognitive categorizations on two axes.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

Influence model – oversimplified.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

Influence model.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

A cognitive prototype (represented by the sphere) influences the shape of an adaptive landscape.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

At a given time, regions of adaptive morphospace appear discrete.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

Areas of morphospace that appear discrete during a certain time interval (represented by the .“sea level”) are historiacally continuous.

Graph: Michael D. C. Drout.

Table of Contents

mobile close